Performance Framework

Idaho statute provides an accountability structure for public charter schools and authorizers. At the heart of this structure is a performance framework that includes the indicators, measures, and metrics used to evaluate each school’s performance outcomes.

The Public Charter School Commission is considering revisions to its Performance Framework. The proposed revisions were presented on June 18, 2020 and will be considered for adoption on August 13, 2020. Please feel free to review the proposal and provide feedback to PCSC staff by contacting a staff member directly or by emailing your feedback to A work session at which the PCSC will hear public feedback directly will be held in July. Please see our meetings page for more details. The pertinent agenda item begins at 1:07:30 of the video below.

All public charter schools in Idaho are issued a performance certificate by their authorizer. This document is a legal agreement detailing the roles and responsibilities of both parties and identifying the five-year operational term awarded to the school. The PCSC’s performance framework is incorporated into each school’s performance certificate and serves to communicate the expected performance outcomes. Each year, schools’ actual outcomes are measured against these established standards, and an annual report is issued to the school and the public. These reports are then used to inform the PCSC’s renewal decisions at the end of each school’s performance certificate term.

The performance framework that applies to all schools establishes standards for outcomes in four categories:  Academic, Operational, Financial, and Mission-Specific.  Mission-Specific measures are not required, but may be included in the school’s performance certificate if additional data points are needed to reflect that school’s unique program and successes.


The academic section focuses on quantitative academic outcomes. It reflects the PCSC’s commitment to considering schools’ performance in the context of their communities and student demographics. Although some results may not be made publicly available, in order to protect individually identifiable student information, the PCSC may still use this information for the purpose of making authorizing decisions.


The mission-specific section provides an opportunity for meaningful acknowledgement of schools’ achievements that are not reflected elsewhere in the framework. These measures may be academic or non-academic in nature, but must be objective and data-driven. Mission-specific measures are generally optional; however, inclusion of certain mission-specific measures may be required as a condition of the performance certificate.


The operational section of the framework contains measures designed to consider whether schools are operating in compliance with federal and state law, authorizer requirements, and the provisions of their performance certificates.


The financial section evaluates schools’ near-term and long-term sustainability. The eight measures in this section are designed to help evaluate a school’s responsible use of public funds by indicating the financial health of the school.

Accountability Designations

Calculation of the percentage of eligible points earned for each school determines that school’s accountability designation in each section. The accountability designations, in turn, guide authorizing decisions. The PCSC considers contextual factors affecting a school’s accountability designations when making authorizing decisions. There are four accountability designations: honor, good standing, remediation, and critical.


Schools achieving at this level in all sections are guaranteed renewal. Replication and expansion proposals are likely to succeed.

Good Standing

Schools achieving at this level in the academic section will be recommended for renewal; however, conditional renewal may be recommended if outcomes in other sections are poor. Replication and expansion proposals will be considered.


Schools achieving at this level in the academic section may be recommended for non-renewal or conditional renewal, particularly if outcomes in other sections are poor. Replication and expansion proposals are unlikely to succeed.


Schools achieving at this level in the academic section face a strong likelihood of non-renewal, particularly if outcomes in other sections are also poor. Replication and expansion proposals will not be considered.